Again, the logging interface of the MM3 doesn't look as nice in my opinion as HPT.
Mm3 tuner cummins software#
HPTuners logging software is a little more nicely setup and has some more options for gauge displays and showing graphs while driving which is definitely nice to have. Its as simple as clicking through on the monitor and launch the logging, and also during logging with the MM3 you can tap on the screen and make a mark in the logs, which I found useful for reducing smoke and fixing a rail pop issue. My only complaint with MM3 is that the software interface screen looks kinda lower quality than HPT, but that is completely personal preference.ĭata logging for the tuner (in person obviously) is much nicer on the MM3. The smoothing tool in both seems to work pretty equally well, just slightly different between programs. The selection style for highlighting cells is a little goofy in MM3, beings its not a highlight and drag like you would find in excel, to select a large square to edit, you highlight the column height and use a side button to select rows.
Basically all the same usual tables are in both softwares, and I would venture to guess they have the capability to make nearly identical power. Now we can start with the tuners prospective- Both softwares are fairly easy to use, they just have their own little quirks.
It has had several different turbos to dial in, setup to spin plenty of Rs, blah blah. I am by NO means anywhere close to an expert on any of this. I have been playing with my own truck tuning via custom software for about 2.5 years. Now that I have tuned my personal truck (2003) with both HPTuners and MM3(Smarty UDC pro), I wanted to go over a few of my experiences from both the tuners prospective and the end users perspective.įirst, a little bit about me/my truck.
0 kommentar(er)
